Microcredit Institutions
I remember watching a program on Mohammad Yunus a year or two ago. I clearly recall him saying that poverty and deprivation among masses is not due to lack of enterprise, but due to lack of capital. He had stressed that with paltry sums as credit, poor people will lift themselves out of poverty.
For the section of society he's talking about the issue seemingly is not about lack of human skills or will, but just a question of "means" to acquire capital.
The Nobel prize is surely well deserved. And relevant too, because it's a peace prize for working towards eliminating poverty. A prosperous Bangladesh is extremism and violence nipped in the bud.
Some critics of micro-credit institutions say that they "individualize the solution to poverty, thereby negating the possibility of social mobilization and the need to change social structure". Of course, this criticism holds no water when we view the empowerment of women Grameen Bank has brought about. Empowering rural women does lead to a change in social mobility patterns and social structures.
However, I wonder if capital is the only bottleneck in raising standards of living among the not-so-poor masses. Isn't lack of knowledge of what is out there a big constraint in unleashing the Human Will? Don't social norms and patterns in one's community constrain one's ambitions? As in.. A wants to be a trader because he's born in so and so community, B wants to get into the Army because he's born in that community, getting a second grade is good enough in so and so community.
In sum, don't sociological factors play as big a role as economic..? Thinking out loud..
For the section of society he's talking about the issue seemingly is not about lack of human skills or will, but just a question of "means" to acquire capital.
The Nobel prize is surely well deserved. And relevant too, because it's a peace prize for working towards eliminating poverty. A prosperous Bangladesh is extremism and violence nipped in the bud.
Some critics of micro-credit institutions say that they "individualize the solution to poverty, thereby negating the possibility of social mobilization and the need to change social structure". Of course, this criticism holds no water when we view the empowerment of women Grameen Bank has brought about. Empowering rural women does lead to a change in social mobility patterns and social structures.
However, I wonder if capital is the only bottleneck in raising standards of living among the not-so-poor masses. Isn't lack of knowledge of what is out there a big constraint in unleashing the Human Will? Don't social norms and patterns in one's community constrain one's ambitions? As in.. A wants to be a trader because he's born in so and so community, B wants to get into the Army because he's born in that community, getting a second grade is good enough in so and so community.
In sum, don't sociological factors play as big a role as economic..? Thinking out loud..